Emergency Backup Protocol (EBP)
Technical Specification
Overview
The Emergency Backup Protocol (EBP) provides automated failover functionality from Solana to BNB Chain during network disruptions or Token-2022 program failures. The protocol operates under pre-approved DAO authorization, enabling rapid emergency response while maintaining community oversight and asset security through a timelock commitment mechanism.
System Architecture
The EBP consists of three core components: pre-approved governance framework, network monitoring with multi-signature execution, and secure time-lock state management.
1. Pre-Approved Governance Framework
DAO Pre-Authorization
The DAO pre-approves the Emergency Backup Protocol during normal network conditions:
Community votes to authorize the multi-signature committee to execute emergency failover
Authorization includes specific parameters: trigger conditions, committee composition, and operational procedures
DAO retains the right to revoke authorization at any time through standard governance voting
No real-time DAO voting required during actual emergencies
Multi-Signature Emergency Committee
Pre-authorized committee of 3-5 trusted community members with emergency execution powers:
Committee can immediately activate EBP when trigger conditions are met
Members are appointed through DAO governance and subject to regular review
Committee actions are transparent and logged on-chain for community oversight
Emergency powers are limited to EBP activation only - no other protocol controls
Accountability and Oversight
All committee actions are publicly recorded and auditable
DAO can review committee decisions post-emergency and adjust authorization
Committee members can be replaced through standard governance if needed
Built-in checks prevent abuse while enabling rapid emergency response
2. Network Monitoring & Emergency Execution
Distributed RPC Monitoring Architecture
The EBP employs a geographically distributed monitoring system to eliminate false positives from local connectivity issues:
Geographic Distribution
3-5 independent monitoring services deployed across different global regions (US East, US West, Europe, Asia, South America)
Each service operates independently with no shared infrastructure or dependencies
Regional diversity ensures local network issues cannot trigger false emergencies
RPC Endpoint Coverage
Each monitoring service tracks 5-10 public Solana RPC endpoints
Endpoints include major providers and geographically diverse nodes
60-second polling interval for real-time status tracking
Majority Consensus Requirement
Emergency trigger requires majority agreement (≥3 out of 5 monitoring services)
Each service must independently confirm all monitored RPC endpoints are unresponsive
72-hour consecutive downtime must be confirmed by the majority before committee notification
False Positive Prevention
Local connectivity issues affect only 1-2 monitoring services → No trigger
Regional internet outages cannot reach majority threshold → No trigger
True Solana network failures affect all regions → Legitimate trigger activation
This distributed approach provides mathematical certainty that triggers represent genuine Solana network failures rather than localized connectivity problems.
Automated Network Status Tracking
The distributed monitoring services continuously track Solana RPC node availability across multiple endpoints and geographic regions. Alert systems aggregate consensus data and notify the multi-signature committee when the majority threshold confirms 72+ hours of consecutive RPC unresponsiveness.
Emergency Trigger Conditions
Single objective criterion for EBP activation:
Majority consensus (≥3 out of 5) of geographically distributed monitoring services confirming Solana RPC nodes unresponsive for 72+ consecutive hours
This simplified trigger eliminates subjective metrics and provides mathematical certainty against false positives from local connectivity issues.
Rapid Committee Response
Upon detecting that majority consensus confirms RPC nodes have been unresponsive for 72+ consecutive hours, the multi-signature committee can immediately initiate the emergency protocol without waiting for DAO voting, leveraging pre-approved authorization.
3. State Management & Time-Lock Security
Regular State Snapshots
State-tracking contract on Solana automatically creates comprehensive checkpoints every 24 hours during normal operations, capturing RUCCO license balances and pending utility fee distributions.
Snapshot Validity Determination
Snapshot validity is determined through Solana's native block finality mechanism:
Valid snapshots correspond to the state at the last finalized block on Solana
If a block is finalized by the Solana network consensus, the corresponding snapshot is automatically considered valid
No additional validation logic or external validators required
This approach leverages Solana's existing security guarantees
Time-Lock Commitment Security
The EBP employs a mandatory time-lock as the sole security mechanism with final commitment:
Hash Commitment Phase
Multi-signature committee publishes the cryptographic hash of the latest 24-hour checkpoint on-chain
Only the hash is revealed, not the actual state data
Solana tokenized licenses are immediately locked upon hash commitment
Commitment is final and irreversible - the process will proceed regardless of subsequent Solana network status
Mandatory 48-Hour Freeze Period
Fixed waiting period during which no state transfer occurs
All RUCCO operations remain frozen on both chains
This temporal isolation provides mathematical security against manipulation attacks
No cancellation mechanism - even if Solana recovers during this period, the 48-hour freeze continues to completion
Reveal and Transfer Activation
After the freeze period, snapshot data is revealed and verified against the committed hash
Upon successful verification, equivalent RUCCO tokenized licenses are minted on BNB Chain
Original Solana tokenized licenses remain locked until network restoration
Design Philosophy - Commitment Finality
Maximum Simplicity: Zero additional logic for cancellation or early termination of the freeze period
Total Predictability: All participants know exactly what to expect once commitment is published
No Edge Cases: Eliminates ambiguous scenarios and potential governance conflicts during the 48-hour freeze
Security First: Time-lock maintains its full security function without compromise
Acceptable Trade-off: If Solana recovers during the freeze period, users wait the full 48 hours anyway - suboptimal but rare, and far better than risking asset loss through complex cancellation mechanisms
Separation of Concerns: The irreversible 48-hour freeze is completely independent from the flexible restoration process, which remains under DAO governance control
Balance and Asset Preservation
All tokenized license balances and pending utility fees maintain exact 1:1 mapping between chains through the time-lock mechanism.
4. Backup Operations & License Continuity
BNB Chain Operations
After the 48-hour security period, RUCCO license holders can resume all transactions and governance operations on BNB Chain with identical balances and rights.
1:1 Tokenized License Backing
RUCCO licenses are locked on Solana upon hash commitment
Equivalent amounts are minted on BNB Chain after time-lock verification using standard BEP-20 token contract
No external bridges or cross-chain protocols required
Simple burn-and-unlock mechanism for Solana restoration
Fee Architecture Activation (Optional)
Initial BNB Chain operations utilize standard BEP-20 token without fee withholding, ensuring immediate operational continuity without complex infrastructure dependencies.
Extended Outage Fee Mechanism: In cases of extended Solana unavailability (>30 days) or DAO-determined necessity, the community may vote to activate the pre-designed fee withholding mechanism:
DAO governance vote required (>66% approval)
Deployment of custom BEP-20 contract with 6.9% utility fee logic
Migration from standard BEP-20 to fee-enabled version
Identical functionality to Token-2022 implementation
Reversible upon Solana restoration
Ambassador Fee Mechanism
During normal operations: 0.9% ambassador fee operates through DAO governance
During EBP: ambassador fees frozen and accumulated during the backup period
Upon Solana restoration: accumulated ambassador fees executed in batch burn operation
After 24 months: unassigned ambassador allocations transition to burn mechanism
Operational Workflow
Pre-Authorization: DAO votes to authorize multi-signature committee and EBP parameters
Continuous Monitoring: Distributed monitoring services track Solana RPC availability across multiple geographic regions
Extended RPC Downtime: Majority consensus confirms RPC nodes unresponsive for 72+ consecutive hours
Emergency Detection: Consensus threshold confirmed, committee notified
Immediate Activation: Multi-signature committee initiates hash commitment using pre-approved authority (latest 24-hour checkpoint)
Hash Commitment: Latest checkpoint hash published, Solana tokenized licenses locked
48-Hour Freeze: Mandatory security waiting period
Verification & Transfer: Snapshot verified, BNB Chain tokenized licenses activated
Backup Operations: Full RUCCO functionality on BNB Chain with standard BEP-20 token
Solana Restoration: DAO votes for return when network stability restored
Asset Return: BNB tokenized licenses burned, Solana tokenized licenses unlocked, ambassador utility fees processed
System Benefits
Reliability & Safety
High Reliability Threshold: 72-hour trigger period ensures activation only for severe, sustained network failures
False Positive Prevention: Distributed monitoring with majority consensus eliminates local connectivity issues from triggering emergency protocols
Predictable Data Loss: Maximum 24-hour rollback provides clear expectations for emergency scenarios
Simplicity & Security
Implementation Simplicity: Single trigger condition and security mechanism reduce complexity dramatically
Automated Checkpoint System: Daily checkpoints eliminate complex validation logic and reduce potential attack vectors
Mathematical Security: 48-hour time-lock provides cryptographic certainty against attacks
No Cancellation Policy: Once hash commitment is published, the 48-hour freeze period continues to completion regardless of Solana network recovery
Governance & Process
Democratic Oversight: DAO maintains ultimate control through pre-authorization and post-emergency review
Predictable Process: Fixed timeline and clear procedures provide certainty for all participants
Accountability: All actions logged and reviewable by the community
Independence
No External Dependencies: Zero reliance on cross-chain bridges or external validation services
Technical Implementation
Governance Smart Contracts
Simple authorization contract storing DAO approval status and committee addresses
Multi-signature wallet with time-lock capabilities
Revocation mechanism for DAO to withdraw authorization
State Management Requirements
Automated 24-hour checkpoint creation during normal operations
Simple checkpoint storage and retrieval system
Straightforward tokenized license locking and minting contracts
No complex validation or verification logic required
Security Considerations
Pre-authorization eliminates real-time governance attack vectors
48-hour freeze period prevents all manipulation attempts with no exceptions
Commitment finality ensures zero cancellation complexity or governance conflicts during emergencies
Committee accountability through transparent on-chain logging
DAO oversight through authorization review and revocation powers
Development Advantages
Simplified governance logic reduces smart contract complexity
No real-time voting mechanisms required during emergencies
Straightforward testing and auditing process
Minimal external dependencies
Conclusion
The EBP provides robust emergency failover through a pre-approved governance model that balances systematic response capabilities with democratic oversight. By separating the irreversible 48-hour security freeze from flexible restoration governance, and securing transfers through time-lock commitment, the protocol achieves maximum effectiveness while maintaining community control and mathematical security guarantees. The two-phase approach ensures emergency activation is deterministic and secure, while restoration decisions remain under democratic control.
Last updated